The Divine Lamp

The unfolding of thy words gives light; it imparts understanding to the simple…Make thy face shine upon thy servant, and teach me thy statutes

Archive for the ‘Notes on Wisdom’ Category

My Notes Wisdom 5:1-5

Posted by Dim Bulb on May 6, 2012

Background~The first section of the Book of Wisdom has a five-fold concentric structure, i.e., written in the form of a reverse parallel:

A1) an exhortation to love justice for it is undying (1:1-15).

B1) the wicked reject judgment, justice and immortality, especially in their speech (1:16-2:24).

C) the hidden counsels of God in relation to suffering, childlessness, and an early death (3:1-4:19)

B2) Judgement of the wicked. Their lament (speech) concerning the effects their rejection of judgement, justice and immortality have brought (4:20-5:23).

A2) An exhortation to learn, honor and love wisdom, the basis of incorruptibility  (6:1-21).

Such a structure has a twofold purpose, to establish connections between the parallel sub-sections (A1 with A2, B1 with B2), but also to indicate that the entire section (1:1-6:21) is a unity. Today’s reading is taken from the B2 sub-section (4:20-5:23), and in my notes I’ll try to bring out some connections with other parts of the whole ((1:1-6:20); but especially with the B1 sub-section (1:16-2:24).

1 Then the righteous man will stand with great confidence in the presence of those who have afflicted him, and those who make light of his labors. (see 2 Thess 1:3-10)

Then. The word provides a connection with verse the last verse of chapter 4 which opens the B2 section from which our reading is taken. That verse (4:20) reads: They will come with dread when their sins are reckoned up, and their lawless deeds will convict them to their face.  The reference is to those who do not understand the hidden counsels of God in relation to things such as suffering, childlessness, and an early death, the subject of the C section in the outline above (Wis 3:1-4:19).

In contrast to the dread felt by the foolish for their sins and lawless deed (Wis 4:20), the righteous man will stand with great confidence in the presence of those who afflicted him, and those who make light of his labors (Wis 5:1). The realization of this fact will cause the just man’s oppressors even more dread and fear (see next verse).

 2 When they see him, they will be shaken with dreadful fear, and they will be amazed at his unexpected salvation.

The reaction of the foolish is brought about by the sudden realization that their philosophy of “might makes right” has been in vain.  Their wisdom was expressed in these words: “Let our might be our law of right, for what is weak proves itself to be useless” (Wis 2:11 the B1 section outlined above). The wisdom of God by which the just man conducts himself is abhorrent to those who hold such a philosophy, a philosophy which led to their afflicting the just: “Let us lie in wait for the righteous man, because he is inconvenient to us and opposes our actions; he reproaches us for sins against the law, and accuses us of sins against our training. He professes to have knowledge of God, and calls himself a child of the Lord. He became to us a reproof of our thoughts; the very sight of him is a burden to us, because his manner of life is unlike that of others, and his ways are strange.” (Wis 2:12-15).

They will be amazed at his unexpected salvation. For these men by their words and deeds summoned death; considering him a friend, they pined away, and they made a covenant with him, because they are fit to belong to his party (Wis 1:16). But, of course, this judgement of those who embraced God’s wisdom was rejected by those who embraced their own: for their wickedness blinded them, and they did not know the secret purposes of God, nor hope for the wages of holiness, nor discern the prize for blameless souls; for God created man for incorruption, and made him in the image of his own eternity, but through the devil’s envy death entered the world, and those who belong to his party experience it. (Wis 2:21-24)

3 They will speak to one another in repentance, and in anguish of spirit they will groan, and say,

Notice that their repentance is not spoken to God, rather they speak to one another, for the time or repentance has passed. Their anguish of spirit now contrasts with their previous self-exhortation: Come, therefore, let us enjoy the good things that exist, and make use of the creation to the full as in youth. Let us take our fill of costly wine and perfumes, and let no flower of spring pass by us. Let us crown ourselves with rosebuds before they wither. Let none of us fail to share in our revelry, everywhere let us leave signs of enjoyment, because this is our portion, and this our lot. (Wis 2:6-9).

4 “This is the man whom we once held in derision and made a byword of reproach — we fools! We thought that his life was madness and that his end was without honor.

This is the man whom we once held in derision. See especially Wisdom 2:10-20.

5 Why has he been numbered among the sons of God? And why is his lot among the saints?

Why has he been numbered among the sons of God? The question indicates that the wisdom of God by which the just man lived-and which these wicked have rejected-is still hidden from them, even as they see the outcome of the just man’s way of life. They know that they have erred (Wis 5:6-13), but they give no indication as to why.  They know that they have been fools because of their thoughts regarding the just (Wis 5:4), but they give no indication of how they themselves should have lived and acted. To leave this life as a fool is to enter into eternity eternally foolish.

Posted in Bible, Catholic, Christ, Devotional Resources, Latin Mass Notes, liturgy, Notes on the Lectionary, Notes on Wisdom, Scripture | Tagged: , , , , , | 3 Comments »

My Notes on Wisdom 2:1, 12-22

Posted by Dim Bulb on March 18, 2012

Wis 2:1  For they have said, reasoning with themselves, but not right: The time of our life is short and tedious, and in the end of a man there is no remedy, and no man hath been known to have returned from hell:

For they have said. A reference to the wicked and ungodly men introduced at the end of the last chapter with these words: But the wicked with works and words have called it  (i.e., death) to them: and esteeming it a friend, have fallen away and have made a covenant with it: because they are worthy to be of the part thereof (Wisdom 1:16). Their culture of death philosophy is introduced here, and continues in the following verses. They reject the concept of immortality (Wisdom 2:1-5) and, as a result, adopt a “live for today alone” approach to the things of this world (Wisdom 2:6-9), and a “might makes right” approach to their fellow human beings (Wisdom 2:10-11). For this reason they persecute the just man whose life and very existence is a witness against them (Wisdom 2:12-20). But they err in thought, and are blinded by wickedness, unable to discern God’s plan for humanity (Wisdom 2:21-22). No doubt thinking themselves highly independent, each one priding himself on being his own man, they are in reality in the devil’s possession (Wisdom 2:23-24).

Verses 12-22 which forms the bulk of today’s readings concerns the suffering of the just man. As is the case with so many texts along these lines, this one is often applied to Christ in the liturgy. See the Responsorial Psalm used today (Psalm 34:17-23) and the Gospel reading (John 7:1-2, 10, 25-30).

Wis 2:12  Let us, therefore, lie in wait for the just, because he is not for our turn, and he is contrary to our doings, and upbraideth us with transgressions of the law, and divulgeth against us the sins of our way of life.

The truly righteous man is a living witness against the sinner who cannot abide the testimony.They say he is not for our turn, i.e., he refuses to turn in their immoral direction. They are incensed that this is itself a witness against them: he is contrary to our doings. The righteous man thinks the time past is sufficient to have fulfilled the will of the Gentiles, for them who have walked in riotousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings and unlawful worshipping of idols, because they know a judgement is coming. The unrighteous, however, think it strange that you run not with them into the same confusion of riotousness (see 1 Peter 4:3-4).

(He) upbraideth us with transgressions of the law, and divulgeth against us the sins of our way of life

I’m reminded of the words of St John Chrysostom concerning St John the Baptist and King Herod:

So great a thing is virtue: so immortal is its memory, so completely even by words only doth it strike down its adversaries. For wherefore did he (Herod) cast him (John) into the prison? Wherefore did John not despise Herod? Was John going to drag him before the judgment-seat of Law? Did John demand vengeance upon Herod for his adultery? Was not what he said then simply a reproof? Why then doth Herod fear and tremble? Was it not words and talk merely? But they stung the king more than deeds. The prophet led Herod not to any judgment-seat, but he dragged him before that other tribunal of conscience; and he sets as judges upon him all who freely gave their verdicts in their thought. Therefore the tyrant trembled, unable to endure the lustre of virtue. Seest thou how great a thing is philosophy? It made a prisoner more lustrous than a king, and the latter is afraid and trembles before him. He indeed only put him in bonds; but that polluted woman rushed on to his slaughter also, although the rebuke was leveled rather against him, [than herself.] For he did not then meet “her” and say, Why cohabitest thou with the king? not that she was guiltless, (how should she be so?) but he wished by that other means to put all to rights. Wherefore he blamed the king, and yet not him with violence of manner. For he did not say, O polluted and all-polluted and lawless and profane one, thou hast trodden under foot the law of God, thou hast despised the commandments, thou hast made thy might law. None of these things; but even in his rebukings great was the gentleness of the man, great his meekness. For, “It is not lawful for! thee,” he says, “to have thy brother Philip’s wife.” The words are those of one who teacheth rather than reproveth, instructeth rather than chasteneth, who composeth to order rather than exposeth, who amendeth rather than trampleth on him. But, as I said, the light is hateful to the thief, and the mere sight of the just man is odious to sinners; “for he is grievous unto us even to behold” (Wisdom 2:15) For they cannot bear his radiance, even as diseased eyes cannot bear the sun’s. But to many of the wicked he is grievous not to behold only, but even to hear of. And therefore that polluted and all-polluted woman, the procuress of her girl, yea rather her murderess, although she had never seen him nor heard his voice, rushed on to his slaughter; and prepareth her whom she brought up in lasciviousnss to proceed also to murder, so extravagantly did she fear him (Homily 28 on 2 Corinthians).

Pope John Paul II (Veritatis Splendor #93)~By witnessing fully to the good, they (martyrs and saints) are a living reproof to those who transgress the law (cf.  Wisdom 2:12), and they make the words of the Prophet echo ever afresh: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!” (Isa 5:20)

(he) upbraideth us with transgressions of the law, and divulgeth against us the sins of our way of life.

Christological: Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites; because you tithe mint and anise and cummin and have left the weightier things of the law: judgment and mercy and faith. These things you ought to have done and not to leave those undone (Matt 23:23).

Wis 2:13  He boasteth that he hath the knowledge of God, and calleth himself the son of God.
Wis 2:14  He is become a censurer of our thoughts.

He hath the knowledge of God…He is become a censurer of our thoughts. Recall that these men were described as “reasoning within themselves, but not rightly (Wisdom 2:1). In their own thoughts they are deceived, and they know not the secrets of God (Wisdom 2:21-22).

He hath the knowledge of God.

Christological: And you have not known him: but I know him. And if I shall say that I know him not, I shall be like to you, a liar. But I do know him and do keep his word (John 8:55).

And calleth himself the Son of God.

Christological:  And they that passed by blasphemed him, wagging their heads, And saying: Vah, thou that destroyest the temple of God and in three days dost rebuild it: save thy own self. If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.  In like manner also the chief priests, with the scribes and ancients, mocking said: He saved others: himself he cannot save. If he be the king of Israel, let him now come down from the cross: and we will believe him.  He trusted in God: let him now deliver him if he will have him. For he said: I am the Son of God. (Matt 27:39-43).

Do you say of him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world: Thou blasphemest; because I said: I am the Son of God? If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not. But if I do, though you will not believe me, believe the works: that you may know and believe that the Father is in me and I in the Father. They sought therefore to take him: and he escaped out of their hands (John 10:36-39).

He is become a censurer of our thoughts.

Christological: And he entered again into the synagogue: and there was a man there who had a withered hand. And they watched him whether he would heal on the sabbath days, that they might accuse him. And he said to the man who had the withered hand: Stand up in the midst. And he saith to them: Is it lawful to do good on the sabbath days, or to do evil? To save life, or to destroy? But they held their peace. And looking round about on them with anger, being grieved for the blindness of their hearts, he saith to the man: Stretch forth thy hand. And he stretched it forth: and his hand was restored unto him. And the Pharisees going out, immediately made a consultation with the Herodians against him, how they might destroy him (Mark 3:1-6).

Wis 2:15  He is grievous unto us, even to behold: for his life is not like other men’s, and his ways are very different.

The very sight of the righteous man makes them irate. This statement of the unrighteous will take on added meaning in verses 17 and 19 (see notes below)

Wis 2:16  We are esteemed by him as triflers, and he abstaineth from our ways as from filthiness, and he preferreth the latter end of the just, and glorieth that he hath God for his father.

Triflers because of their superficial philosophy (Wisdom 2:1-5) and the lifestyle they have embraced because of it (Wisdom 2:6-10). Triflers because they treat the righteous man of no account, and persecute him (Wisdom 2:12-20). They are thoroughly superficial:  clouds without water, which are carried about by winds: trees of the autumn, unfruitful, twice dead, plucked up by the roots: Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own confusion: wandering stars, to whom the storm of darkness is reserved for ever (Jude 12-13).

Wis 2:17  Let us see then if his words be true, and let us prove what shall happen to him, and we shall know what his end shall be.
Wis 2:18  For if he be the true son of God, he will defend him, and will deliver him from the hands of his enemies.

In verse 15 they said, he is grievous to us, even to behold, but here they wish to try and test him to see for themselves if he is righteous and true, and if his end is as he hopes. Here they imitate Satan, the Devil, in whose possession they are (Wisdom 2:24-25, John 8:42-44), for he tempted Christ is just such a manner: If thou be the son of God…(Matt 4:1-11). See also Matt 27:39-43.

Wis 2:19  Let us examine him by outrages and tortures, that we may know his meekness, and try his patience.

Note the reference to examining and knowing. They bring up once again the theme of sight (verse 15 & 17) and knowledge (“reasoning with themselves”, verse 1). Also, having determined that we are born of nothing, and after this we shall be as if we had not been: for the breath in our nostrils is smoke (Wisdom 2:2), the unrighteous have decided that the lives of others of of no real consequence: Let us examine him by outrages and tortures.

Wis 2:20  Let us condemn him to a most shameful death: for there shall be respect had unto him by his words.

Modern translation such as the RSV differ regarding the second part of the verse: Let us condemn him to a shameful death, for, according to what he says, he will be protected.

Wis 2:21  These things they thought, and were deceived: for their own malice blinded them.
Wis 2:22  And they knew not the secrets of God, nor hoped for the wages of justice, nor esteemed the honour of holy souls.

These verses take us back to the beginning of the passage.

 

Posted in Bible, Catholic, Christ, Devotional Resources, Lent, liturgy, Notes on Wisdom, Scripture | Tagged: , , , | 2 Comments »

My Own Catena Aurea on Wisdom 2:23-3:9

Posted by Dim Bulb on November 6, 2011

Those who know what a Catena Aurea actually is may be disappointed.

Wis 2:23  For God created man incorruptible, and to the image of his own likeness he made him.

Gaudium et Spes 12: For Sacred Scripture teaches that man was created “to the image of God,” is capable of knowing and loving his Creator, and was appointed by Him as master of all earthly creatures(Gen 1:26, Wis 2:23)) that he might subdue them and use them to God’s glory (cf. Sirach 17:3-10). “What is man that you should care for him? You have made him little less than the angels, and crowned him with glory and honor. You have given him rule over the works of your hands, putting all things under his feet” (Ps 8:5-7).

Pope John Paul II, The Gospel of Life 34: In the biblical narrative, the difference between man and other creatures is shown above all by the fact that only the creation of man is presented as the result of a special decision on the part of God, a deliberation to establish a particular and specific bond with the Creator: “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness” (Gen 1:26). The life which God offers to man is a gift by which God shares something of himself with his creature.

Israel would ponder at length the meaning of this particular bond between man and God. The Book of Sirach too recognizes that God, in creating human beings, “endowed themwith strength like his own, and made them in his own image” (Sir 17:3). The biblical author sees as part of this image not only man’s dominion over the world but also those spiritual faculties which are distinctively human, such as reason, discernment between good and evil, and free will: “He filled them with knowledge and understanding, and showed them good and evil” (Sir17:7). The ability to attain truth and freedom are human prerogatives inasmuchas man is created in the image of his Creator, God who is true and just (cf. Deut 32:4). Man alone, among all visible creatures, is “capable of knowing and loving his Creator” (GS 12) The life which God bestows upon man is much more than mere existence in time. It is a drive towards fullness of life; it is the seed of an existence which transcends the very limits of time: “For God created man for incorruption, and made him in the image of his own eternity” (Wis 2:23).

Pope John Paul II, Sollicitudo rei Socialis 29: Development which is not only economic must be measured and oriented according to the reality and vocation of man seen in his totality, namely, according to his interior dimension. There is no doubt that he needs created goods and the products of industry, which is constantly being enriched by scientific and technological progress. And the ever greater availability of material goods not only meets needs but also opens new horizons. The danger of the misuse of material goods and the appearance of artificial needs should in no way hinder the regard we have for the new goods and resources placed at our disposal and the use we make of them. On the contrary, we must see them as a gift from God and as a response to the human vocation, which is fully realized in Christ.

However, in trying to achieve true development we must never lose sight of that dimension which is in the specific nature of man, who has been created by God in his image and likeness (cf.  Gen 1:26). It is a bodily and a spiritual nature, symbolized in the second creation account by the two elements: the earth, from which God forms man’s body, and the breath of life which he breathes into man’s nostrils (cf.  Gen 2:7).

Thus man comes to have a certain affinity with other creatures: he is called to use them, and to be involved with them. As the Genesis account says (cf.  Gen 2:15), he is placed in the garden with the duty of cultivating and watching over it, being superior to the other creatures placed by God under his dominion (cf.  Gen 1:25-26). But at the same time man must remain subject to the will of God, who imposes limits upon his use and dominion over things (cf.  Gen 2:16-17), just as he promises his mortality (cf. Gen 2:9; Wis 2:23). Thus man, being the image of God, has a true affinity with him too. On the basis of this teaching, development cannot consist only in the use, dominion over and indiscriminate possession of created things and the products of human industry, but rather in subordinating the possession, dominion and use to man’s divine likeness and to his vocation to immortality. This is the transcendent reality of the human being, a reality which is seen to be shared from the beginning by a couple, a man and a woman (cf.  Gen 1:27), and is therefore fundamentally social.

Wis 2:24  But by the envy of the devil, death came into the world:
Wis 2:25  And they follow him that are of his side.

Please note that in modern translations such as the NAB verses 24 and 25 are combined, thus the NAB has no verse 25. I’m here using the Douay-Rheims.

Pope St Gregory the Great, The Pastoral Rule, part 3, chapter 10: The envious are to be admonished how great is their blindness who fail by other men’s advancement, and pine away at other men’s rejoicing; how great is their unhappiness who are made worse by the bettering of their neighbour, and in beholding the increase of another’s prosperity are uneasily vexed within themselves, and die of the plague of their own heart. What can be more unhappy than these, who, when touched by the sight of happiness, are made more wicked by the pain of seeing it? But, moreover, the good things of others which they cannot have they might, if they loved them, make their own. For indeed all are constituted together in faith as are many members in one body; which are indeed diverse as to their office, but in mutually agreeing with each other are made one. Whence it comes to pass that the foot sees by the eye, and the eyes walk by the feet; that the hearing of the ears serves the mouth, and the tongue of the mouth concurs with the ears for their benefit; that the belly supports the hands, and the hands work for the belly. In the very arrangement of the body, therefore, we learn what we should observe in our conduct. It is, then, too shameful not to act up to what we are. Those things, in fact, are ours which we love in others, even though we cannot follow them; and what things are loved in us become theirs that love them. Hence, then, let the envious consider of how great power is charity, which makes ours without labour works of labour not our own. The envious are therefore to be told that, when they fail to keep themselves from spite, they are being sunk into the old wickedness of the wily foe. For of him it is written, But by envy of the devil death entered into the world (Wis 2:24). For, because be had himself lost heaven, he envied it to created man, and, being himself ruined, by ruining others he heaped up his own damnation. The envious are to be admonished, that they may learn to how great slips of ruin growing under them they are liable; since, while they cast not forth spite out of their heart, they are slipping down to open wickedness of deeds. For, unless Cain had envied the accepted sacrificeof his brother, he would never have come to taking away his life. Whence it is written, And the Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering, but unto Cain and to his offering He had not respect. And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell (Gen 4:4). Thus spite on account of the sacrifice was the seed-plot of fraticide. For him whose being better than himself vexed him he cut off from being at all. The envious are to be told that, while they consume themselves with this inward plague, they destiny whatever good they seem to have within them. Whence it is written, Soundness of heart is the life of the flesh, but envy the rottenness of the bones (Prov 14:30). For what is signified by the flesh but certain weak and tender actions, and what by the bones but brave ones? And for the most part it comes to pass that some, with innocence of heart, in some of their actions seem weak; but others, though performing some stout deeds before human eyes, still pine away inwardly with the pestilence of envy towards what is good in others. Wherefore it is well said, Soundness of heart is the life of the flesh; because, if innocence of mind is kept, even such things as are weak outwardly are in time strengthened. And rightly it is there added, Envy is the rottenness of the bones; because through the vice of spite what seems strong to human eyes perishes in the eyes of God. For the rotting of the bones through envy means that certain even strong things utterly perish.

Catechism of the Catholic Church 1008: Death is a consequence of sin. The Church’s Magisterium, as authentic interpreter of the affirmations of Scripture and Tradition, teaches that death entered the world on account of man’s sin(Gen 2:17; 3:3; 3:19; Wis 1:13; Rom 5:12; 6:23; Denzinger 1511).  Even though man’s nature is mortal God had destined him not to die. Death was therefore contrary to the plans of God the Creator and entered the world as a consequence of sin (Wis 2:23-24). “Bodily death, from which man would have been immune had he not sinned” is thus “the last enemy” of man left to be conquered (GS 18, #2; 1 Cor 15:26).

Pope John Paul II, The Gospel of Life 7: “God did not make death, andhe does not delight in the death of the living. For he has created all thingsthat they might exist … God created man for incorruption, and made him in theimage of his own eternity, but through the devil’s envy death entered theworld, and those who belong to his party experience it” (Wis 1:13-14; 2:23-24).

The Gospel of life, proclaimed in the beginning when man was created in the image of God for a destiny of full and perfect life (cf. Gen 2:7; Wis 9:2-3), is contradicted by the painful experience of death which enters the world and casts its shadow of meaninglessness over man’s entire existence. Death came into the world as a result of the devil’s envy (cf. Gen 3:1, 4-5) and the sin of our first parents (cf.  Gen 2:17,). And death entered it in a violent way, through the killing of Abel by his brother Cain:”And when they were in the field, Cain rose up against his brother Abel,and killed him” (Gen 4:8).

This first murder is presented with singular eloquence in a page of the Book of Genesis which has universal significance: it is a pagerewritten daily, with inexorable and degrading frequency, in the book of human history.

Pope John Paul II, The Gospel of Life 53: God proclaims that he is absolute Lord of the life ofman, who is formed in his image and likeness (cf.  Gen 1:26-28). Human lifeis thus given a sacred and inviolable character, which reflects the inviolability of the Creator himself. Precisely for this reason God will severely judge every violation of the commandment “You shall notkill”, the commandment which is at the basis of all life together in society. He is the “goel” (Hebrew גּאל,) the defender of the innocent (cf. Gen 4:9-15; Isa 41:14 Jer 50:34 Ps 19:14). God thus shows that he does not delight in the death of the living (cf.  Wis 1:13). Only Satan can delight therein: for through his envy death entered the world (cf.  Wis 2:24). He who is”a murderer from the beginning”, is also “a liar and the fatherof lies” (Jn 8:44). By deceiving man he leads him to projects of sin and death, making them appear as goals and fruits of life.

St Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiæ I-II, 81, 1: The Apostle says (Rom 5:12): “By one man sin entered into this world, and by sin death.” Nor can this be understood as denoting imitation or suggestion, since it is written (Wis 2:24): “By the envy of the devil, death came into this world.” It follows therefore that through origin from the first man sin entered into the world.

I answer that According to the Catholic Faith we are bound to hold that the first sin of the first man is transmitted to his descendants, by way of origin. For this reason children are taken to be baptized soon after their birth, to show that they have to be washed from some uncleanness. The contrary is part of the Pelagian heresy, as is clear from Augustine in many of his books [*For instance, Retract. i, 9; De Pecc. Merit. et Remiss. ix; Contra Julian. iii, 1; De Dono Persev. xi, xii.]In endeavoring to explain how the sin of our first parent could be transmitted by way of origin to his descendants, various writers have gone about it in various ways. For some, considering that the subject of sin is the rational soul, maintained that the rational soul is transmitted with the semen, so that thus an infected soul would seem to produce other infected souls. Others, rejecting this as erroneous, endeavored to show how the guilt of the parent’s soul can be transmitted to the children, even though the soul be not transmitted, from the fact that defects of the body are transmitted from parent to child—thus a leper may beget a leper, or a gouty man may be the father of a gouty son, on account of some seminal corruption, although this corruption is not leprosy or gout. Now since the body is proportionate to the soul, and since the soul’s defects redound into the body, and vice versa, in like manner, say they, a culpable defect of the soul is passed on to the child, through the transmission of the semen, albeit the semen itself is not the subject of the guilt.But all these explanations are insufficient. Because, granted that some bodily defects are transmitted by way of origin from parent to child, and granted that even some defects of the soul are transmitted in consequence, on account of a defect in the bodily habit, as in the case of idiots begetting idiots; nevertheless the fact of having a defect by the way of origin seems to exclude the notion of guilt, which is essentially something voluntary. Wherefore granted that the rational soul were transmitted, from the very fact that the stain on the child’s soul is not in its will, it would cease to be a guilty stain binding its subject to punishment; for, as the Philosopher says (Ethic. iii, 5), “no one reproaches a man born blind; one rather takes pity on him.”Therefore we must explain the matter otherwise by saying that all men born of Adam may be considered as one man, inasmuch as they have one common nature, which they receive from their first parents; even as in civil matters, all who are members of one community are reputed as one body, and the whole community as one man. Indeed Porphyry says (Praedic., De Specie) that “by sharing the same species, many men are one man.” Accordingly the multitude of men born of Adam, are as so many members of one body. Now the action of one member of the body, of the hand for instance, is voluntary not by the will of that hand, but by the will of the soul, the first mover of the members. Wherefore a murder which the hand commits would not be imputed as a sin to the hand, considered by itself as apart from the body, but is imputed to it as something belonging to man and moved by man’s first moving principle. In this way, then, the disorder which is in this man born of Adam, is voluntary, not by his will, but by the will of his first parent, who, by the movement of generation, moves all who originate from him, even as the soul’s will moves all the members to their actions. Hence the sin which is thus transmitted by the first parent to his descendants is called “original,” just as the sin which flows from the soul into the bodily members is called “actual.” And just as the actual sin that is committed by a member of the body, is not the sin of that member, except inasmuch as that member is a part of the man, for which reason it is called a “human sin”; so original sin is not the sin of this person, except inasmuch as this person receives his nature from his first parent, for which reason it is called the “sin of nature,” according to Ep 2,3: “We . . . were by nature children of wrath.”

St Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiæ, II-II 36, 4: It does not follow from the passage quoted (from Pope Gregory the Great’s Moralia) that envy is the greatest of sins, but that when the devil tempts us to envy, he is enticing us to that which has its chief place in his heart, for as quoted further on in the same passage, “by the envy of the devil, death came into the world” (Sg 2,24).There is, however, a kind of envy which is accounted among the most grievous sins, viz. envy of another’s spiritual good, which envy is a sorrow for the increase of God’s grace, and not merely for our neighbor’s good. Hence it is accounted a sin against the Holy Ghost, because thereby a man envies, as it were, the Holy Ghost Himself, Who is glorified in His works.

Wis 3:1  But the souls of the just are in the hand of God, and the torment of death shall not touch them.

Saint Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, The Seven Words on the Cross, chapter 19: We have come to the last word which our Lord pronounced. At the point of death Jesus, “crying with a loud voice said, Father, into Thy hands I commend my spirit.” (Luke 23:46). We will explain each word separately. “Father.” Deservedly does He call God His Father, for He was a Son who had been obedient to His Father even unto death, and it was proper that His last dying request, which was certain to be heard, should be prefaced by such a tender name. “Into Thy hands.” In the Sacred Scriptures the hands of God signify the intelligence and will of God, or in other words His wisdom and power, or, again, the intelligence of God which knows all things, and the will of God which can do all things. With these two attributes as with hands, God does all things, and stands not in need of any instruments in the accomplishment of His will. St. Leo says: “The will of God is His omnipotence.”  Consequently, with God to will is to do. “He hath done all things, whatsoever He would.” (Ps 115:3) “I commend.” I hand over to your keeping My life, with the sure faith of its being restored when the time of My resurrection shall come. “My Spirit.” There is a diversity of opinion as to the meaning of this word. Ordinarily the word spirit is synonymous with soul, which is the substantial form of the body, but it can also mean life itself, since breathing is the sign of life. Those who breathe live, and those die who cease to breathe. If by the word spirit we here understand the Soul of Christ, we must take care not to think that His Soul at the moment of it’s separation from the Body was in any danger. We are accustomed to commend with many prayers and much anxiety the souls of the agonizing, because they are on the point of appearing at the tribunal of a strict Judge to receive the reward or the punishment of their thoughts, words, and deeds. The Soul of Christ was in no such need, both because it enjoyed the Beatific Vision from the time of its creation, was hypostatically united to the person of the Son of God, and could even be called the Soul of God, and also because it was leaving the body victorious and triumphant, an object of terror to the devils, not a soul to be scared by them. If the word spirit then is to be taken as synonymous with soul, the meaning of these words of our Lord, “I commend my spirit,” is that the Soul of Christ which was enclosed in the body as in a tabernacle was about to throw itself into the hands of the Father as into a place of trust until it should return to the body, according to the words of the Book of Wisdom: “The souls of the just are in the hand of God.” (Wis 3:1). However, the more generally accepted meaning of the word in this passage is the life of the body. With this interpretation the word may be thus amplified. I now give up My breath of life, and as I cease to breathe I cease to live. But this breath, this life I intrust to you, My Father, that in a short time you may again restore it to My Body. In your keeping nothing perishes. In you all things live. By a word you call into existence things which were not, and by a word you give life to those who had it not.

Wis 3:2  In the sight of the unwise they seemed to die: and their departure was taken for misery:
Wis 3:3  And their going away from us, for utter destruction: but they are in peace.
Wis 3:4  And though in the sight of men they suffered torments, their hope is full of immortality.
Wis 3:5  Afflicted in few things, in many they shall be well rewarded: because God hath tried them, and found them worthy of himself.
Wis 3:6  As gold in the furnace, he hath proved them, and as a victim of a holocaust, he hath received them, and in time there shall be respect had to them.
Wis 3:7  The just shall shine, and shall run to and fro like sparks among the reeds.
Wis 3:8  They shall judge nations, and rule over people, and their Lord shall reign for ever.
Wis 3:9  They that trust in him shall understand the truth: and they that are faithful in love, shall rest in him: for grace and peace are to his elect.

Pope Benedict XVI, Homily, November 5, 2009“The souls of the righteous are in the hand of God” (Wis 3:1). The First Reading, taken from the Book of Wisdom, speaks of the righteous who are persecuted, unjustly put to death. But, the sacred Author emphasizes, even if their deaths occurred in circumstances so humiliating and painful as to seem shocking, in truth, for those who have faith this is not so, for “they are at peace”. And even if they undergo punishment in the eyes of men, “their hope is full of immortality” (Wis 3:3-4). The loss of loved ones is painful. The event of death is a disquieting enigma; but for believers, however it occurs, it is always illumined by the “hope of immortality”. Faith sustains us in these moments, charged with human sadness and discouragement. “In your eyes, life is not taken away but transformed,” the Liturgy recalls, “and whilst the land of this earthly exile is destroyed, an eternal home is being prepared in Heaven” (Preface, Mass for the Dead). Dear brothers and sisters, we know well and we experience in our own journeys that there is no lack of difficulties and problems in this life. There are situations of suffering and of pain, difficult moments to understand and accept. All this, however, acquires worth and meaning if it is considered in the perspective of eternity. In fact, every challenge, accepted with persevering patience and offered for the Kingdom of God, already works to our spiritual advantage here on earth and above all in the next life, in Heaven. In this world we are in transit; we are tested in the crucible like gold, as the Sacred Scripture affirms (cf.  Wis 3:6). United mysteriously to Christ’s passion, we can make of our existence a pleasing offering to the Lord, a voluntary sacrifice of love.

Posted in Bible, Catholic, Devotional Resources, fathers of the church, liturgy, Notes on the Lectionary, Notes on Wisdom, Quotes, Scripture | Tagged: , , , , | 2 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 72 other followers