Text in red, if any, are my additions.
2 CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 12
In this chapter the Apostle refers to the wonderful secret revelations which had been made to him, as a proof of his authority ; and announces his intention to pay another visit to Corinth.
2 Cor 12:1. If I must boast, this indeed is not expedient, but [ will come to visions and revelations of the Lord.
If I must boast. Under protest, and because you require this proof of my divine commission, I will tell you that I have received this wonderful favour from heaven, although the nature of the revelation made to me is not to be communicated to mortal man. So the Vulgate and the Syriac. The Greek text differs slightly. Boasting is not good for me; and Theodoret says that as the Greek fathers understand it, he means to say that my relation of this occurrence is of no advantage to myself, but may be useful to you.
Visions and Revelations. Visions may be granted without revelations, when the meaning is not understood, as to Pharaoh, Gen. 41:17, to Nabuchodonosor, Dan. 2:31. The revelation adds to the vision the intelligence of the meaning of what is seen. Of the Lord, not of the devil, who also is able to send visions and revelations. St. Thomas.
2 Cor 12:2. I know a man in Christ, fourteen years ago (whether in the body I know not, or out of the body I know not, God knows), such an one caught up to the third heaven.
I know a man in Christ. He suppresses his own name, out of modesty. A man in Christ. That is, a Christian.
Fourteen years ago. He had concealed all knowledge of this wonderful event for fourteen years, and would have continued to do so till the end of his life, if the Corinthians had not compelled him to refer to it. St. Thomas thinks the vision here referred to was seen at the time of Saint Paul’s conversion, during the three days when he could neither see nor eat, Acts 11:9. Baronius and modern writers calculate more accurately that it must have happened about eight years after his conversion, probably at the time he went to Antioch with Barnabas, Acts xii. Baron. Ann. 44 and 58. See also Estius.
The third heaven is a Hebrew phrase for the highest heaven. We have in the Scriptures mention of three heavens; the aerial heaven, where the clouds float; the sidereal heaven, where are the planets and the stars; and the empyreal heaven, or world of the angels, into which last Saint Paul was rapt. Whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell. The words seem to imply that the Apostle’s own impression was that he had actually been taken up to heaven in the body, but was not absolutely certain. This is the opinion of Saint Chrysostom, Ambrose, Grotius, Fromond, and others. Cornelius à Lapide thinks it the more probable opinion that he was conveyed to heaven in the body, as well as in spirit ; and Father George Ambianus is decidedly of that opinion, De conditione vaptus. Among modern writers the more general view is that the Apostle was rapt up to heaven only intellectually and in an ecstasy, not physically or corporeally ; but that the soul remained still united with the body, as St. Thomas thinks, and was not separated from it by death. As the body is said to be rapt, when violently removed from its place by an external force, so the soul is rapt when taken from the shadows and symbols on which its knowledge of external things depends, and raised to the unclouded vision and clear intelligence of the angels in heaven.
In support of the first opinion it may be observed that the verb used in the Greek is not ἐξέστη (exeste), visited with an ecstasy, but ἁρπαγέντα (harpagenta), which seems to suit better with the idea of a bodily transportation. And as Saint Chrysostom remarks, it was in a sense due to Saint Paul that he should receive a favour not inferior to that which was granted to the other Apostles, who conversed with Christ in the body. As Saint Peter saw his glory on Mount Thabor, so did Saint Paul in the third heaven. And as Moses conversed with God in the mountain, before he came forth to promulgate the law, so Saint Paul conversed with Christ in heaven before he went forth as the teacher of the nations. But after all, a question with regard to which the Apostle was himself uncertain, must remain uncertain for us.
2 Cor 12:3. And I know such a man (whether in the body or out of the body I know not; God knows):
2 Cor 12:4. That he was rapt into Paradise, and heard secret words, which man may not speak.
2 Cor 12:5. On behalf of such an one I will boast; but for myself I will not boast but in my infirmities.
2 Cor 12:6. For though I were willing to boast, I shall not be a fool; but I spare, lest any one esteem me above what he sees in me, or hears from me.
Secret words, (Latin: arcana verba), is in the Greek ἄρρητα ῥήματα (arreta rhemata), unutterable utterances, things so great that man cannot explain them, and transcending all power of speech. He recurs to this in verse 6. The mention of paradise suggests to some ancient writers, and among them Ambrose, St. Anselm, and Theophylact, that this is a distinct vision from that referred to in verse 2, where he says he was rapt into heaven. But it seems more probable that whereas in the heavenly vision his intellect was enlightened by the knowledge of sublime mysteries of truth, he intends by the use of the word paradise to denote the sweetness and delight with which his heart was filled and overflowed. Heaven denotes the perfection of knowledge, paradise the perfection of joy. He heard unutterable things, because he was instructed by another, for instruction comes by hearing. St. Thomas. This doctor, as. well as St. Chrysostom, St. Anselm, and St. Augustine (xii. 28 de Gen.) consider that Saint Paul beheld the divine essence in this vision; but a contrary opinion is maintained by modern writers. But the Apostle then adds, if I were able, or if I were permitted, to tell what I saw and heard, all doubts would be removed, all cavils silenced. I should not then be a fool. I refrain, lest you should think me an angel, or a god, like the people of Lystra, Acts 14:10, or the people of Maltaat a later date, Acts 17. If they offered bulls in sacrifice when he wrought a miracle, what would they not have done, had he revealed all he knew? Theophylact. The example of Saint Paul in concealing this divine favour for fourteen years, is worthy of observation and imitation. When compelled to speak of it he does so as briefly as possible, and in ambiguous and enigmatical terms, and at once proceeds to record the humiliation that followed. God’s gifts are secret. If compelled to speak, say as little as possible, and recur at once to thy own nothingness.
2 Cor 12:7. And lest the greatness of the revelations should lift me up, there was given me a sting of my flesh, an angel of Satan to buffet me.
2 Cor 12:8. On account of which I thrice besought the Lord, that it might depart from me.
2 Cor 12:9. And he said to me: My grace is sufficient for thee; for virtue is perfected in infirmity.
The Apostle here changes the person, and shews that he has been speaking of himself. Should lift me up. For he also was human. Theophylact. The sting is in the Vulgate stimulus, in the Greek σκόλοψ (skolops), which, according to Grotius, signifies a thorn, according to Erasmus a sharp stake. A stimulus is properly a stake shod with iron to drive oxen when at work. This affliction Saint Paul ascribes to Satan, but nevertheless says it was given to him by the overruling goodness of God. The verb rendered buffet, or bruise, might either infer pain or humilation, or both together. As to the nature of this infliction, there is great variety of conjecture among ecclesiastical writers. The Greek fathers, Saint Chrysostom, Theodoret, and Theophylact, and Ambrose among the Latins, think it signifies persecution from enemies of the faith, urged on by the Devil. This is also the opinion of Erasmus. F. George Ambianus, quoted by Grotius, thinks it was an acute pain in the head or ears. Saint Thomas, that it was a painful disorder of the intestines. Some of the authorities cited by Cornelius à Lapide consider that it was a weakness of the stomach; others that the devils assailed him literally with blows and violence, as in the case of Saint Antony. The modern opinion now most commonly received is that it was a motion of concupiscence suggesting impure ideas to the imagination, and exciting rebellion and tumult in the flesh. In support of this latter view there is urged, 1, the metaphorical terms in which the Apostle describes it; 2, he says it was in his flesh, which hardly agrees with persecution from without; 3, it was occasioned by an angel of Satan, which would scarcely have been said of any ordinary form of disease; 4, the word colaphizat (in Greek: κολαφίζῃ) seems to imply humiliation; whereas persecution for God’s sake brings glory, and disease inflicts pain, not shame; and 5, if it had been persecution or disease, he would not so earnestly have prayed for deliverance from it. Erasmus rejects the idea altogether, as unworthy of so great a man, and one so far advanced in age. (Hammond, i loc. suggests that the affliction referred to by Saint Paul was an affliction of the eyes, which impaired his sight, and from which there are other grounds for believing that he suffered. He dictated all his epistles to an amanuensis, adding only a few words in his own handwriting at the end, for identification, and these written in very large characters. You see in what large letters I write in my own hand, Gal. 6:11. In support of this conjecture it may be observed that he refers to his infirmity as if it were already well known; and if it were of the kind suggested above, and known only to himself, it seems hardly likely that he would have alluded to it at all; while the urgency with which he prayed for deliverance would imply that it was something he thought likely to occasion hindrance to the exercise of his ministry).
I besought the Lord thrice. Doubtless at these different oblations of the Holy Sacrifice. But Saint Chrysostom thinks that thrice means simply often. That it, that is the angel of Satan, might leave me. The prayers of the just are often heard, when not heard; heard for their good, unheard for their wishes. God is good, and often withholds what we want,to give what we want still more. St. Jerome. The patient under the knife will call out for mercy, but the operator does not listen. St. Augustine. Virtue is made perfect in weakness. Virtue is not here opposed to vice, but to weakness. The Greek has my power. The power of God is shown forth most conspicuously through the infirmity of man.
2 Cor 12:9. Willingly therefore I will glory in my infirmities, that the virtue of Christ may dwell in me.
2 Cor 12:10. On that account I please myself in my infirmities, in insults, in destitution, in persecutions, in distress for Christ: for when I am weak, then am I powerful. —
2 Cor 12:11 I am become a fool: you have compelled me: for I ought to be commended by you; for I am in nothing inferior to those who are Apostles beyond measure: though I am nothing.
2 Cor 12:12. Yet the signs of my apostolate were done upon you in all patience, in signs, and miracles, and powers.
Since the power of Christ is most manifest in the weakness of man, I will willingly glory (the Greek text has, I will most willingly glory more) in my infirmities, whether of nature or coming upon me by God’s permission from without, than in the fullness of divine revelation which has been accorded me, because the power of Christ dwells in me; according to the Syriac, overshadows and protects me. And this being the case, my own weakness and infirmities, the insults to which I am exposed, the poverty and destitution in which I live, the persecutions I endure, the troubles and perplexities I undergo, all for Christ’s sake, are to me actually a source of joy and pleasure, because through all these things the power of Christ, which dwells in me, is more conspicuously manifest. And if in saying this I have used language which sounds like boasting, this is your fault. It is you who have compelled me, for I have only done what you ought to have done for me. It was for you to stand up for me, your Apostle. In no sign or character of the Apostolate am I inferior, I will not say to the heretical teachers who are endeavouring to mislead you, and constantly depreciating my work, but even to the first and greatest of the Apostles of Christ. You have compelled me to make this assertion, not for the sake of my own dignity, but out of regard to your salvation, which is imperilled by the false teachers to whom you listen. Saint Anselm thinks the words supra modum, apostoli (“apostles beyond measure”) refer to St. Peter, St. John, and St. James; and the Syriac has the very great Apostles. The first character of the Apostolate mentioned by St. Paul in verse 12 is patience, the suffering persecution and poverty for Christ’s sake. The second is the exercise of miraculous powers, which he distinguishes into signs, miracles, and powers, greater, lesser, and more ordinary. You know this, and you ought not to have left it to me to assert and defend my apostolic commission, and you might have spared me the necessity of doing so.
2 Cor 12:13. For what is there that you have had less of than the other churches, except that I personally put you to no expense? Forgive me this wrong.
Other churches, planted in other places by other Apostles, have enjoyed no privileges you have not equally received, whether in the full announcement of the truths of the Gospel, or their confirmation by miracle. ‘The only difference in your case is that whereas the other Apostles usually accept offerings for their maintenance and expenses, I would not do so at Corinth. , St. Paul’s motive for acting in this way possibly arose from the condition of pagan society at Corinth, to which he preferred not to be, even indirectly, under any obligation. This resolution to live at my own expense, he adds satirically, is an injury which I should think you might easily forgive. It is to be wished that all Christian missionaries were, like St. Paul, chargeable with no other error than this.
2 Cor 12:14. Behold, this third time I am prepared to come to you: and I shall not burden you. For I seek not what is yours, but you. For sons should not lay up treasure for their parents, but the parents for the sons.
2 Cor 12:15. But I will most willingly spend and then be spent myself for your soul; though the more I love the less I may be loved.
2 Cor 12:16. But be it so; I did not burden you: but as I am crafty, I caught you by artifice.
2 Cor 12:17. I requested Titus to go to you, and sent the brother with him. Did Titus cheat you? Did we not walk in the same spirit, in the same footsteps?
(13) This third time I am prepared to come to you. Saint Paul had in fact only visited Corinth once, but he had intended to do so a second time a few months previously, and was prevented by circumstances. On this account he says, I am coming the third time. See 2 Cor 1:15-17 of this Epistle. But when I come I shall continue to live at my own charge, and cost you nothing. For, he adds (14), what I seek is not your goods, but yourselves; not what is yours, but you. An apostle is a fisher of men, and a hunter of souls. The words are intended to soften his sarcasm in verse 13. There may also be an allusion to the heretical teachers, as if he would imply that they apparently acted on a different principle. I am in the place of your father (14); and would gladly give all I have for you, and my life at last (15); and this with the ardent and disinterested affection which seeks no return; though the more I love, the less I may be loved. He proceeds to reply to a most ungrounded calumny brought against him by his opponents at Corinth, who could not deny that he lived there at his own expense, but they asserted that he only did so ostensibly and in pretence (16), and meanwhile surreptitiously accepted contributions collected by his agents. Titus and Luke (17. See 2 Cor 7:18) came to you at my request; did either of these act or teach in any way differently from myself? We were all animated by the same spirit, and followed the same course of life.
2 Cor 12:19. Do you still think we are excusing ourselves to you? Before God and in Christ we speak; but all, most beloved, for your edification.
2 Cor 12:20. For I fear lest perhaps when I come I shall not find you such as I wish, and may be found by you such as you wish not. Lest there be among you contentions, emulations, animosities, dissensions, detractions, whispers, inflations, seditions;
2 Cor 12:21. And that when I come again God may humble me among you; and I may have to mourn for many of those who sinned before, and have not done penance for the uncleanness and fornication and immodesty which they have done. Note: in modern translation this chapter has 21 verses, whereas in the version used by de Piconio there were 22 verses because the second half of verse 20 (“Lest there be among you….seditions”) was given its own verse number. I changed it to the modern practice to avoid confusion.
(19) Are you still unconvinced, and inclined to ascribe all I have said to the solicitude of a guilty conscience, as if I was anxious to clear myself in the sight of men? Am I a defendant on trial, trying to find excuses for myself? The Vulgate begins verse 19 with olim putatis (“think you of old”), as if the translator had read παλαι (palai = long ago, formerly, etc.) in the Greek, but the present text has πάλιν (palin), which seems to give a more intelligible meaning, as above (Actually, most modern translations opt for palai. Father de Piconio was writing in the late 17th century. “Have you been thinking all along” is a common translation~NABRE; NIV; ESV; NRSV). The Syriac has do you still think? Yet surely you may trust me when I speak, as I now speak, in presence of God, who sees the heart, and in the spirit of Christ, which is sincerity and truth. All I have said, I have said not for my own glory, or in my own defence, but for your edification ; from desire for your salvation, fear for your danger of falling from the faith. I fear that I shall not find the faults corrected, which I have pointed out ; that you will find in me a severe judge, rather than a kind and loving father. The faults are those I endeavoured in the former epistle to correct ; verbal controversies, personal rivalry, angry feelings, calumnious charges, party spirit, discord, pride, tumult, sedition. This is not all, nor the worst ; Iam afraid I shall find, to my grief and humiliation, many persons whom I have been compelled to censure for an openly flagitious course of life, persisting in their wickedness, and refusing to do penance. Ambrose remarks that this passage proves, against Novatian, that fornicators might, in the days of the Apostles, be admitted to penance.
CORROLARY OF PIETY
Certainly it is disappointing to find Saint Paul, carried up to the third heaven among the holy Angels, admitted to the joys of Paradise, and this, as he himself thought probable, in bodily presence as well as in spirit, unable or not permitted to reveal to us the great and glorious things he heard and saw. Both because it would have given him a more powerful and effectual argument in his controversy with his opponents; but still more, because for our own sake we cannot but wish to know what he knew, and hear what he heard. But for some reason, it cannot be so. The words he heard were unutterable by mortal lips. Saint John, like Saint Paul, was in spirit taken up to heaven, and saw the Throne of God, and Him who sat thereon. All was gleaming with splendour, with the iris of emerald above, the Seniors, clothed in white and crowned with gold, enthroned around; and from the Throne of God proceeded lightnings, and voices, and thunders. But what these voices said, he has not told us. Even in our experience of earth we find enough to prove that the secrets of heaven cannot be rendered intelligible to mortal man. Who, but a Christian, understands the motives of the Christian life? The wind blows where it will, and we hear it, yet know not whence it comes or whither it goes. Who, outside the Church of Christ, can form the faintest conception of the motives of the Religious Life? And this, the ludicrous mistakes made by Protestant writers on the subject, evidently prove. Heaven and heavenly things are an enigma to the mind which is not enlightened by the Spirit of God. Whatever may have been the tenor of the arcana verba (secret words) which Paul heard in heaven, they did not make him more in love with earth, nor make him less desirous to attain his heavenly home. The secrets of heaven are withheld from us, because they are too glorious for our weakness to endure. I have many things to say, our Lord said to His Apostles, but you cannot bear them now. Only eternity will be long enough to say them, only immortality strong enough to endure them. And the joy and delight of God’s presence, when we are admitted to it, will come upon us as an endless, boundless, and glorious surprise.