The Divine Lamp

Posts Tagged ‘St Paul’s life’

This Weeks Posts: Sunday Jan 23-Saturday Jan 29

Posted by carmelcutthroat on January 29, 2011

Some posts are scheduled in advance and will not be available until the time indicated. Further posts (e.g., commentary on next Sunday’s readings, etc) will be added to any upcoming day.
********************************************************************

SUNDAY, JAN 23
THIRD SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME

Readings.

Last Weeks Posts: Jan 16-22.

Resources For Sunday Mass, Jan 23. This is a weekly feature on this blog, next Sunday’s Mass resources will be posted on Wednesday.
********************************************************************

MONDAY JAN 24
MEMORIAL OF ST FRANCIS DE SALES, BISHOP AND DOCTOR OF THE CHURCH

Readings.

Father Callan on Today’s First Reading (Heb 9:15, 24-28). 12:03 AM EST.

Aquinas’ Catena Aurea on Today’s Gospel (Mark 3:22-30). 12:05 AM EST.

Some Online Works By and About St Francis de Sales. 12:10 AM EST.

*********************************************************************

TUESDAY JAN 25
FEAST OF THE CONVERSION OF ST PAUL, APOSTLE

Readings.

Father Callan on Today’s First Reading (Acts 22:3-16). 12:05 AM EST.

Aquinas’ Catena Aurea on Today’s Gospel (Mark 16:15-18)12:10 AM EST.

Free Online Resources for the Feast of St Paul’s Conversion. 12:15 AM EST.

Aquinas’ Catena Aurea on Matt 5:1-12 for Sunday Mass, Jan 30.

Cornelius a Lapide on 1 Corinthians 1:26-31 for Sunday Mass, Jan 30.

Bernardin de Piconio (Picquigny) on 1 Corinthians 1:26-31 for Sunday Mass Jan 30. This is actually a commentary on verses 18-31 but it is not terribly long.

Father Callan on 1 Corinthians 1:26-31 for Sunday Mass, Jan 30.

*********************************************************************

WEDNESDAY JAN 26
MEMORIAL OF SAINTS TIMOTHY AND TITUS, BISHOPS

Readings. Note that the first reading has two choices.

Father Callan on Today’s First Reading (2 Tim 1:1-8). 12:10 AM EST.

Bishop MacEvily on the Alternate First Reading (Titus 1:1-5). 12:10 AM EST.

Father Callan on the Alternate First Reading (Titus 1:1-5). 12:10 AM EST.

Aquinas’ Catena Aurea on Today’s Gospel (Mark 4:1-20). 12:10 AM EST.

Resources For Sunday Mass, Jan 30. Ordinary and Extraordinary Forms.

Pope John Paul II on Psalm 146 for Sunday Mass, Jan 30.

Bernardin de Piconio on Romans 13:8-10 for Sunday Mass, Jan 30 (Extraordinary Form).

Father Callan on Romans 13:8-10 for Sunday Mass, Jan 30 (Extraordinary Form).

Bishop MacEvily on Romans 13:8-10 for Sunday Mass, Jan 30 (Extraordinary Form).

Aquinas’ Catena Aurea on Matt 8:23-27 for Sunday Mass, Jan 30 (Extraordinary Form).

Cornelius a Lapide on Matt 8:23-27 for Sunday Mass, Jan 30 (Extraordinary Form).

The Mystical Ship: Aquinas’ Homily Notes on Matt 8:23 for Sunday Mass, Jan 30 (Extraordinary Form).

********************************************************************

THURSDAY JAN 27
THIRD WEEK IN ORDINARY TIME

Readings.

Father Callan on Today’s First Reading (Heb 10:19-25). 12:05 AM EST.

Aquinas’ Catena Aurea on Today’s Gospel (Mark 4:21-25). 12:10 AM EST.
********************************************************************

FRIDAY JAN 28
MEMORIAL OF ST THOMAS AQUINAS, PRIEST AND DOCTOR OF THE CHURCH

Readings.

Father Callan on Today’s First Reading (Heb 10:32-39). 12:05 AM EST.

Aquinas’ Lecture on Heb 10:32-39.

Aquinas’ Catena Aurea on Today’s Gospel (Mark 4:26-34). 12:10 AM EST.

The English Translations of Aquinas’ Major Works Online. Most of the titles are in Latin but the actual texts are in English.

An English Translation of Aquinas’ Commentary on the Psalms. Scroll down.

Thomas Aquinas. Online book. This is a famous study of his thought by Father Martin D’Arcy.

Medieval Philosophy Illustrated From the System of Thomas Aquinas. Online book. A very good introduction to his thought.

The Bread of Life: St Thomas Aquinas on the Adorable Sacrament of the Altar. Online book.

The Life and Labors of St Thomas of Aquino. Online book by Archbishop Roger Vaughn.
********************************************************************

SATURDAY JAN 29
THIRD WEEK IN ORDINARY TIME

Readings.

Father Callan on Today’s First Reading (Heb 11:1-2, 8-19). 12:05 AM EST.

Aquinas’ Catena Aurea on Today’s Gospel (Mark 4:35-41). 12:10 AM EST.

Posted in Audio/Video Lectures, Bible, Catechetical Resources, Catholic, Christ, Devotional Resources, fathers of the church, Latin Mass Notes, liturgy, Notes on 2 Tim, Notes on Acts of Apostles, Notes on Hebrews, Notes on Mark, Notes on the Lectionary, Notes on Titus, Quotes, Scripture, St Francis de Sales, St Paul's life, St Thomas Aquinas | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Free Online Resources for the Feast of the Conversion of St Paul

Posted by carmelcutthroat on January 25, 2011

This post contains free online resources relating to the life, letters and theology of St Paul. The resources include both written and audio material. At the very end of the post I’ve included some links to books available for purchase.

Pope Benedict XVI’s Catechesis on St Paul:

In The Footsteps Of St Paul. Audio series of 13 one-half hour shows by Father Mitch Pacwa.

St Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians. Audio series of 13 one-half hour shows by Father Mitch Pacwa.

Taylor Marshall Podcasts:

Conversion of Heart: The Conversion of St Paul. Podcast by David Higbee delivered at the Chesterton Society Conference in Rochester, NY.

The Life of St Paul: (podcasts by David Higbee)

First Corinthians Podcast Study: (David Higbee)

Second Corinthians Podcast Study: (David Higbee)

Romans Podcast Study: (David Higbee)

Paul’s Letters. A Podcast by Jeff Crandall, St Martha’s Church, Texas.

Contested Letters of Paul’s. Podcast by Jeff Crandall. I think all the letters of St Paul were written by St Paul. However, I also think one should be acquainted with why some reject his authorship of certain letters.

Paul’s Trials and Tribulations. Podcast by Jeff Crandall.

Acts of Apostles and Captivity Letters. 11 Podcasts by Jeff Crandall.

Romans. Several podcast on Romans and some other NT letters by Jeff Crandall.

SUGGESTED READING:

Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture: (This is an excellent new series of commentaries on the NT).

Ignatius Study Bible (New Testament). A good place for those with little time or little knowledge of St Paul’s writings to begin.

A Pocket Guide to St Paul. An overview of his life, thought and letters by Dr. Scott Hahn.

St Paul and the Power of the Cross. An excellent introduction to one of St Paul’s dominant themes by Fr. Mitch Pacwa.

The Catholic Perspective on Paul: Paul and the Origins of Catholic Christianity. By Taylor Marshall, popular blogger, author and speaker.

Posted in Apologetics, Audio/Video Lectures, BENEDICT XVI CATECHESIS, Bible, Books, Catechetical Resources, Catholic, Christ, Devotional Resources, Eucharist, St Paul's life | Tagged: , , , , | 2 Comments »

Father Callan’s Commentary on Acts 22:3-16 for the Feast of the Conversion of St Paul

Posted by carmelcutthroat on January 25, 2011

This post contains a summary of Acts 22:1-22 followed by commentary on today’s reading. Text in red represent my additions to the commentary.

St. Paul’s Discourse to the Jews in Defense of Himself
A Summary of Acts of Apostles 22:1-21

St. Paul’s discourse may be divided into three parts, each of which is a response to the different accusations made against him by the Jews. It was said that he was an enemy of Israel; and therefore in the first part of his discourse (verses 1-5) he shows that although born in Tarsus, he was a Jew, educated in Jerusalem, and that he became one of the most zealous of the Pharisees and a most terrible persecutor of the Christians. He was accused of
being an enemy of the Law, and of having preached against it; and so in the second part (verses 6-16) he says that, if from a zealous Pharisee he became a Christian convert, it was because God Himself appeared to him on the way to Damascus and led him into the Church by the hand of Ananias, a man holy according to the Law. He was called an enemy of the Temple; and consequently in the third part (verses 17-21) he declares that it was in the very Temple of Jerusalem that he received from God the mission to convert the pagans (Sales).

3. And he saith : I am a Jew, born at Tarsus in Cilicia, but brought up in this city, at the feet of Gamaliel, taught according to the truth of the law of the fathers, zealous for the law, as also all you are this day

Gamaliel. See on v. 34. At the feet of means, to be a disciple or student of. The teacher among the Jews occupied an elevated seat, and the pupils sat below on benches.

Instead of zealous for the law, the Greek has “zealous toward God.”

4. Who persecuted this way unto death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women.

This way; i.e., those who professed the Christian religion. The Greek term ὁδός (hodos = path, road, highway, etc.) and its numerous Hebrew and Greek equivalents usually “have the primary meaning of “road,” “customary path,” “course of travel” (Gen 3:24 Ex 23:20 Num20:17, etc).  By a very easy and natural figure “way” is applied to the course of human conduct, the manner of life which one lives (Ex 18:20 Ex 32:8 Num 22:32 1 Sam 8:3; 1 Kings 13:33, etc.; Ac 14:16 1Cor 4:17 James 5:20).  “The way of an eagle …. of a serpent …. of a ship …. and of a man” (Prov 30:19) agree in that they leave no trace behind them (compare The Wisdom of Solomon 5:10,11). In some cases the language may be such as to leave it indeterminate whether the way or course of conduct is good or bad (Dt 28:29 1 Sam 18:14; 2 Chron 27:7; 2 Chron 13:15 Prov 3:6 Prov 6:6 James 1:8), though in most cases the Bible writers attach to every act an ethical evaluation. Sometimes this way of conduct is of purely human choice, without reference to either God or good (Judges 2:19; 22:15; 34:21 Ps 119:9 Prov 12:15; 16,2). Such a course is evil (2 Chron 7:14 Ps 1:6 119:101, 104, 128; Prov 1:19, etc.) and will obtain such punishment as its lack of merit warrants (1 kings 8:32,39; 2 Chron 6:23; 30:12; 34:11 Jer 17:10 Ezek 7:3, 9; Hosea 12:2). At the opposite extreme from this is the good way (Ps 1:6 Prov 8:20; 12:28; 15:10 Isa 26:7), which is that course of conduct enjoined by God and exemplified in His perfect conduct (Gen 6:12; 18:19; Deut 8:6; 26:17; 1 Kings 2:3; 23:11 Ps 51:13, etc.). These two ways briefly but graphically described by the Lord (Matt 7:13, 14; compare Luke 13:24) became the subject of extended catechetical instruction in the early church. See the Epistle of Barnabas, xviii, and the Didache 1.1. Frequently the way in this metaphorical sense is characterized by that quality which is its outstanding feature, e.g. mention is made of the way of life (Prov 15:24; Jer 21:8; Act 2:28); of truth (Ps 119:30; 2 Pet 2:2); of peace (Isa 59:8; Luke 1:79; Rom 3:17); of justice (Prov 17:23; Dan 4:37); of righteousness (Matt 21:32; 2 Pet 2:21); of salvation (Acts 16:17); of lying (Ps 119:29), and of death (Jer 21:8). Frequently God’s purpose or His customary action is described as His way (Ps 103:7; Isa 26:8; Matt 22:16; Acts 13:10). Since all of God’s plans and purposes tend toward man’s salvation, His provisions to this end are frequently spoken of as His Way, and inasmuch as all of the divine plans center in Christ He is preeminently the Way (John 14:6). Out of this fact grew the title, “The Way,” one of the earliest names applied to Christianity (Acts 9:2; 18:25, 26; 19:9, 23; 22:4; 24:22).” {International Standard Bible Dictionary}

5. As the high priest doth bear me witness, and all the ancients : from whom also receiving letters to the brethren, I went to Damascus, that I might bring them bound from thence to Jerusalem to be punished.

The high priest. See on Acts 9:1-2.  Here is what Fr. Callan writes in that place: Saul was of the tribe of Benjamin, but a native of Tarsus in Cilicia, and therefore by birth a Roman citizen. As a youth he was taken to Jerusalem and studied at the feet of Gamaliel. He belonged to the strictest sect of the Pharisees and was zealous above all others for the Pharisaic observances. St. Paul was most probably converted in A.D. 35, and was about thirty years old at the time. See on Acts 7:57.

Full of deadly hate towards the Christian, Saul was not satisfied with what happened to St. Stephen, but, continuing to persecute the Church, he wanted to extend the persecution outside of Palestine. He therefore went to the High Priest, Annas, and requested “letters” authorizing him to persecute the Christians in Damascus, if he should find there any men or women of this way, i.e., of the Christian way of living. Damascus was the capital of Syria and situated about 125 miles northeast of Jerusalem. It was taken by the Romans under Pompey, but later (A.D. 37-38) fell to the Arabian king Aretas in the latter’s war with Herod Antipas. The Jews in Damascus at this time were very numerous, and their synagogues were many.

St. Paul wanted to bring any Christians he might find in Damascus to Jerusalem, in order that they might there be punished by the supreme council, or Sanhedrim, for what was considered their apostasy and blasphemy.

At this point Fr. Callan refers the readers back to his commentary on the first account of St Paul’s conversion narrated in Acts 9:3-17.

6. And it came to pass, as I was going, and drawing nigh to Damascus at midday, that suddenly from heaven there shone round about me a great light:

There are three distinct accounts given of the conversion of St. Paul,—in chapter 9, in chapter 22, and in chapter 26. The first is for Christian readers, the second was addressed to Jews, and the third to Agrippa and Festus.

There shone round about me a great light. a heavenly illumination appeared at midday (see Acts 26:13).

7. And falling on the ground, I heard a voice saying to me: Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
8. And I answered: Who art thou, Lord? And he said to me: I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest.

Saul, Saul, etc. These words show the tenderness and compassion of Christ both toward the persecutor and the persecuted members of His mystical body, the Church. To persecute the faithful was to persecute our Lord Himself; to persecute the body was to persecute the Head.

9. And they that were with me, saw indeed the light, but they heard not the voice of him that spoke with me.

According to the account in Acts 26:14 St Paul was addressed with the Hebrew language. Some manuscripts import that detail into this passage, but it is lacking in the better mss. Likewise, the proverb the Lord is said to have spoken in Acts 26:14 (“It is hard for you to kick against the goad”) has been imported into some mss at this point.

10. And I said: What shall I do, Lord? And the Lord said to me: Arise, and go to Damascus; and there it shall be told thee of all things that thou must do.

Prostrate and trembling before his Master, Paul asks only to know what he should do; and our Lord tells him to go into the city of Damascus, and there God shall declare to him His will by means of Ananias. Paul must first be baptized and received into the Church by the ministers appointed by God.

11. And whereas I did not see for the brightness of that light, being led by the hand by my companions, I came to Damascus.

His eyes being still dazzled by the brightness that shone in our Lord’s glorified body. His sight was withheld from him for three days, doubtless to give him time to consider in prayer and without distraction what had happened to him.

In Luke there is a connection between “light” and “glory.”  See Luke 2:9, 14, 32; Luke 9:31-32. In writing about the ministry of the New Covenant to which he was called St Paul penned this: “For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God, in the face of Christ Jesus.”

12. And one Ananias, a (devout) man according to the law, having testimony of all the Jews who dwelt there,

Father Callan’s translation lacks the word devout (or pious) but inasmuch as it is found in nearly all modern translations I suspect the omission was an oversite on his part. The fact that Ananias was known to be “a devout man according to the law” would hold great weight with St Paul’s audience whom he has just noted are zealous for the law (see verses 3 above). The description of Ananias here reminds the reader of other individuals who appear in the narrative of Luke/Acts, e.g., Elizabeth and Zechariah (Luke 2:6); the centurion (Luke 7:5); Joseph a Arimathea (Luke 23:50); Tabitha (Acts 9:36); Cornelius (Acts 10:2).

13. Coming to me, and standing by me, said to me : Brother Saul, look up. And I the same hour looked upon him.

The sudden cure of St. Paul’s blindness shows that it was miraculous.

14. But he said: The God of our fathers hath preordained thee that thou shouldst know his will, and see the Just One, and shouldst hear the voice from his mouth.

Hath preordained thee; i.e., hath chosen thee.

The Just One; i.e., Jesus Christ. See on Acts 3:14; 7:52. The term is also used by a centurion to describe Jesus at the crucifixion in Luke 23:47. In all three uses in Acts the title is associated with the death of Jesus (Acts 3:14, 7:52, 22:14). The context of each usage is important because the title is found on the lips of Christians who are being opposed or persecuted. Blessed shall you be when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you and shall reproach you and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man’s sake.  Be glad in that day and rejoice: for behold, your reward is great in heaven, For according to these things did their fathers to the prophets (Luke 6:22-23).

The title “the Just One” also calls to mind the Suffering Servant Song of Isaiah 53:11. In the context of the first use of the title (Acts 3:14) Jesus is referred to as servant 3 times (Acts 3:13; 4:27, 30).

15. For thou shalt be his witness to all men, of those things which thou hast seen and heard.

St. Paul had seen Christ, had heard his voice, and had been instructed by Him in regard to the truths of the Gospel (Gal 1:11 ff.).

16. And now why tarriest thou? Rise up, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, invoking his name.

The converted call upon the name of the Lord (Acts 2:21) and such were the very people Saul (Paul) persecuted, for he had authority from the chief priests to bind all that invoke thy name (Acts 9:14, 21). With his conversion the persecutor became the persecuted one.

Posted in Bible, Catholic, Christ, Devotional Resources, liturgy, Notes on Acts of Apostles, Notes on the Lectionary, Quotes, Scripture, St Paul's life | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »

Video: Lecture 1 On St Paul, His Life And Conversion

Posted by carmelcutthroat on February 2, 2010

This is the first in a series of 5 videos on St Paul. Unfortunately, I was unable to publish all five of them in a single post. Here are the links to the other 4 posts: Lecture 2, On Romans
Lecture 3, 1 & 2 Thess. and Galatians

Lecture 4, 1 & 2 Corinthians

Lecture  Colossian, Philippians, Ephesians
.
Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Audio: Lecture 1 On St Paul“, posted with vodpod

Posted in Audio/Video Lectures, Bible, Catholic, St Paul's life, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Video: Lecture 2 On St Paul

Posted by carmelcutthroat on February 2, 2010

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Audio: Lecture 2 On St Paul“, posted with vodpod

Posted in Audio/Video Lectures, Bible, St Paul's life | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Video: Lecture 3 On St Paul

Posted by carmelcutthroat on February 2, 2010

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Audio: Lecture 3 On St Paul“, posted with vodpod

Posted in Audio/Video Lectures, Bible, St Paul's life | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Video: Lecture 4 On St Paul

Posted by carmelcutthroat on February 2, 2010

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Audio: Lecture 4 On St Paul“, posted with vodpod

Posted in Audio/Video Lectures, Bible, St Paul's life | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Video: Lecture 5 On St Paul

Posted by carmelcutthroat on February 2, 2010

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Video: Lecture 5 On St Paul“, posted with vodpod

Posted in Audio/Video Lectures, Bible, St Paul's life | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Feast Of The Conversion Of St Paul

Posted by carmelcutthroat on January 25, 2010

.

A more extensive list of resources can be found here.

Rabbi Saul Becomes Apostle PaulPodcast.

The Life Of St Paul: Podcasts

Pope Benedict XVI: From his catechesis on the Apostles (text)

Pope Benedict XVI. From his Year of St Paul Catechesis.

Posted in Audio/Video Lectures, Bible, Catechetical Resources, Catholic, Year of St Paul | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Notes On 1 Corinthians 1:18-2:5 by Father Charles Callan

Posted by carmelcutthroat on July 25, 2009

The Apostle now gives a second argument against factions, attacking directly the party spirit of those who were following Apollo (1:17b-3:4).  If his own preaching among the Corinthians was simple and unadorned that affords no cause for divisions among them.  The first reason why he used simple language in preaching to them was because the Gospel is opposed to human wisdom (1:17b-2:5), and secondly because the Gospel contains a wisdom which only the perfect can grasp (2:6-3:4).

Why St Paul Made Use Of Simple Speech In Preaching The Gospel To The Corinthians, 1:17b-2:5

Human wisdom and loftiness of speech are not to be made use of in preaching the Gospel, lest the cross of Christ be deprived of its real power and efficacy.  This is clear, first from prophecy (1:19); secondly from experience, which shows that the wise of this world have not been chosen to preach the Gospel (1:20-25), nor are many of them to be found among those who have embraced its teaching (1:26-2:5).

I’ll here reproduce all of 1:17, placing 17b in italics.

1:17.  For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the Gospel: not in wisdom of speech, lest the cross of Christ should be made void.

17b.  The Wisdom of speech, etc.  There is no article in Greek.  The meaning is that it was not the will of Christ that St Paul, in preaching the Gospel, should have recourse to such human wisdom and such elegance of expression as the Greeks admired and cultivated.  This would have deprived the Gospel of the real source of its power, namely, the death of Christ on the cross, and would have made its success depend, or at least appear to depend, on human means.

Later preachers of the Gospel are not forbidden to  make use of the arguments of philosophy or of the powers of rhetoric in their sermons, first because the eficacy and preaching of the cross have been thoroughly established now; and secondly because, not having the inspiration and the marvelous powers of St Paul, they need those human aids.

1:18. For the word of the cross, to them indeed that perish, is foolishness; but to them that are saved, that is, to us, it is the power of God.

18. The word of the cross, i.e., the preaching of a crucified God, to them that perish, i.e., to those, whether Jew or Gentile, who by their infidelity are on the way to perdition, is foolishness; because to such worldly minds it was absurd to think of God becoming man and then dying the death of a malefactor in order to save the world.

But to them that are saved, i.e., to those who, through faith, are working out their salvation, the cross of Christ is the power of God, i.e., the source of the efficacy of the Gospel which, unlike Greek philosophy and rhetoric, is able to transform and perfect the life of all who sincerely believe it and put into practice it teachings.  The term for power here is δύναμις (dunamis), which means internal capability as opposed to ενεργεια, the exercise of power.

The cross, then, has the power to save men from sin, if they will make use of its teaching.  Saving power is also attributed by St Paul to the Gospel (Rom 1:16; 1 Thess 1:5), to God (2 Cor 4:7; 13:4), to the Holy Spirit (Eph 3:16, 20), to the Resurrection (Phil 3:10), and to Christ (Col 1:28-29).

1:19. For it is written: I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the prudence of the prudent I will reject
1:20 Where is the wise?  Where is the scribe?  Where is the disputer of this world?  Hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

1:19.  that the preaching of the Gospel ought not to be according to human wisdom the Apostle now proves by appealing to the Prophet Isaiah (29:14) through whom God announced that He would confound the wisdom of those who confided in human rather than in divine help.  Literally the Prophet’s words, here cited almost exactly according to the Septuagint, refer to those Jews who, when God had promised to deliver them from the terrors of the Assyrian King Sennacherib (705-681 BC), relied on their own prudence and trusted in the help they hoped to recieve from Egypt, rather than in the divine promise.  It was not, says the Prophet, by such worldly wisdom that God would save His people from the coming invasion.  Now, what literally referred to these Jews had reference spiritually to the worldly-wise at the time of the preaching of the Gospel; these, like the jews of old, were not to be saved by means of human wisdom, but by the preaching of what seemed foolish to merely carnal and earthly minds.

The clause, I will reject, is put by St Paul in the place of “I will hide,” of the LXX.

1:20.  Whether the Apostle is quoting here from Isaiah 33:18, or speaking his own words, is not quite clear.  Perhaps he is not quoting, but only referring to facts commonly known.  As the Jews triumphed over the Assyrians, so the preaching of the cross has won the victory over human learning.  For among the preachers of the Gospel where, asks the Apostle, is the wise? i.e., the doctor of the Jewish Law?  Where is the disputer? etc., i.e., the philosopher and the sophist, who dispute every question that arises?

The words, of this world, better “of the world” (with manuscripts B A C D), mean the sinful, faithless world, and are more probably to be connected with each of the preceding substantives,-“wise,” “scribe” and “disputer.”

Since God has not chosen the wise and the learned of this world to propagate His Gospel among the nations, is it not evident that he has made foolish the wisdom of this world?

In the Vulgate, huius mundi should be simply mundi.

1:21. For seeing that in the wisdom of God the world, by wisdom, knew not God, it pleased God, by the foolishness of our preaching, to save them that believe.

There was a very good reason why God did not choose the wise of this world for the propagation of His Gospel, namely, because they could not grasp so great a mystery.  The wordly-wise and the carnal-minded failed to recognize God when He revealed Himself, both in the works of nature and in the revelation of the Old Testament; hence God chose to save, through the preaching of Christ crucified, those that believe.

Wisdom of God more probably means that divine wisdom that was manifested in the book of nature for the pagans, and also in the Old Testament Scriptures for the Jews.

The world, i.e., by the use of only natural learning, embracing the philosophical systems of the pagans as well as the doctrines of the unbelieving Jews (Cornely).

Knew not God, i.e., had not that correct knowledge of the one true God which was necessary and able to lead them to salvation.

In view of this failure on the part of the pagan philosophers and the carnal Jews to arrive at anything like an adequate notion of the Deity it pleased God, i.e., God in His wisdom, justice and mercy thought it well (Tertullian), or decreed (Hilary) to open a new way to divine knowledge and salvation, namely, the preaching of a crucified Savior, which would save all who would accept it with faith.

1:22. For both the Jews require signs, and the Greeks seek after wisdom.

This verse continues to explain how the preaching of the cross, or of Christ crucified, was a stumbling block to the jews and foolishness to the pagans.  The former were expecting signs, i.e., miracles of their own choosing to be performed by the Messiah; that is, they expected Him to be a glorious and powerful King who would subjugate the temporal rulers of the world and place the Jews in triumph over their enemies; while the Greeks always required something that whold appeal to their reason and human intelligence.  To the latter “it seemed opposed to human wisdom that God should die, and that a just and wise man should willingly give himself over to a most shameful death” (St Thomas).

1:23. But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews indeed a stumbling block, and unto the Gentiles foolishness:
1:24. for unto them that are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.
1:25. For the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

1:23-24.  But we, etc.  Contrary to the expectations of both Jews and Gentiles the Gospel is the preaching of a crucified Messiah.  It was, therefore, a stumbling block, i.e., a scandal, an offence, to the Jews, giving them a pretext to reject the Christ; and to the Gentiles, foolishness, because it seemed to them the height of folly that God should die and that human salvation should be obtained through the death of a man on an infamous gibbet.

But the reason why the Gospel is an offence to the Jews and foolishness to the Gentiles is because both these classes of infidels do not receive it with faith (vs 21).  For unto them that are called (δύναμις κλητοις), i.e., to those that hear and obey the call, whether Jews or pagans, the Gospel of Jesus Christ crucified is the power of God, i.e., the divine force that has manifested itself, not only in the whole series of miracles performed by Christ and narrated in the preaching of the Apostles, but which, through the Apostolic preaching, was constantly operating, making all things new.  It was furthermore the wisdon of God, because it unfolded a plan of salvation which God alone could have formulated and executed (Cornely).

1:25. The reason why the results of a thing apparently weak and foolish are so extraordinary is because they are the effects of divine wisdom and divine operation; for the foolishness of God, i.e., that which to merely human minds appears to be foolish, is wiser than all the wisdom of men; and likewise, that which men call the weakness of God is stronger than all the strength of men.  This, indeed, has been verified in the preaching of the cross, which has effected what all the wisdom and power of earth could not effect, namely, the destruction of sin and the renovation of the world.

1:26. For see your vocation, brethren, that there are not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble:
1:27. for the foolish things of the world hath God chosen, that he may confound the wise; and the weak things of the world hath God chosen, that he may confound the strong.

1:26.  Not only did God cast aside the wisdom of tis world in choosing the preachers of the Gospel, but He did likewise in the choice of those whom He first called to embrace the teachings of the Gospel.  This is illustrated among the Corinthians themselves.  Hence the Apostle bids them to consider their own vocation.  Among those who had become Christian there were not many distinguished for their human learning, not many who enjoyed great wealth and influence, not many of noble birth; the vast majority of the faithful of Corinth, as of all the early Christians, were from the humbler walks of life and society.  The pagans in fact reproached the Church for being made up of low classes,-fo slaves, artisans and the like (Tacitus, AnnXV. 44; Justin, Apol. ii. 9; Origen, Contra Celsum, ii. 79); and yet all this was in conformity with the prediction of Isaiah and with what our Lord Himself said of His Kingdom (Isa 61:1; Matt 11:5; Luke 4:17; etc.).

1:27.  The reason of the foregoing actions on the part of God is now given.  Man, in his pride and self-sufficiency, had misused the gifts of God, thinking that all the blessings he enjoyed were due to himself, and despising those who were less favored than he.  Thus, earthly wisdom and power had been made by man a means of sin and disorder.  To counteract this state of things God called, as preachers of His Gospel and as members of His Church, those who were considered ignorant and weak, while He left to their own confusion those who considered themselves wise and powerful.

1:28. And the base things of the world, and the things that are contemptible, hath God chosen, and things that are not, that he might bring to nought things that are:
1:29. That no flesh should glory in his sight.
1:30. But of him are you in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and justice, and sanctification, and redemption.
1:31.  That, as it is written: He that glorieth , may glory in the Lord.

Although foolish things and weak things are in the neuter gender, they are understood for the masculine (cf. John 6:37; Gal 3:22; Heb 7:7).

1:28.  Here again we find the neuter plural used for the masculine to heighten the paradox between the ways of God and the ways of men.  The Apostle cites three classes of persons, called by God to the faith, who were in striking contrast to those of noble birth (vs 26) that were not called: the base, i.e., those who have not sprung from noble ancestry; the contemptible, i.e., those that are despised and regarded as nothing; things that are not, i.e., those who are considered as not existing.  All these kinds of persons God has brought to the faith of the Crucified, in order to confound and prove to be useless in the work of saving the world those who were considered great according to earthly standards.

If, with A C D F G and Old Latin, we omit και before ταμη οντα, things that are not, these words form only a clause in apposition to the preceding clauses of the verse, an are not the climax of the sentence.  Manuscripts B E, The Received Text, Vulgate and Peshitto are in favor of retaining και.

1:29.  The purpose of God’s action in choosing the rude, the weak and the “things that are not” to confound the wise and the strong and to bring to naught the “things that are,” was that no flesh should glory in his sight, i.e., that no one might be able to attribute his justification and salvation to his own wisdom, or power, or noble birth, but only to the goodness and mercy of God, and that thus all should recognize God as the sole author of human sanctification and salvation.  Supernatural things are from us only through the operation of God’s grace.

In his sight (Vulg., in conspectu eius) should be “in God’s sight,” to agree with the best Greek reading.

1:30.  Although the Corinthians have nothing of themselves whereof to glory before God, they may, nevertheless, glory in this, that of him, i.e., from God, as form the source of their supernatural life, they are in Christ Jesus, i.e., they have, through Baptism, been incorporated in the mystical body of Christ, being made members of Christ’s Church.  To be “in Christ Jesus” means in St Paul to be a member of the Church of Christ (cf. 9:1; Rom 16:7; Gal 1:22; etc.).

Who of God, etc.  Since Christians are His members, Crhist communicates to them the gifts he possesses from God, namely, His wisdom, by which the darkenss of error and ignorance are expelled fromn the mind; His justice and sanctification, by which they are made truly holy and pleasing in the sight of God; His  redemption, by which they are liberated from the serive of sin and the devil.

Justice and sanctification are closely connected by τε και to show they are really the same; for man is not first justified and then sanctified, but both at one and the same time through the infusion of sanctifying grace (Cornely).

It is evident that the Apostle here is not speaking about imputed justice in the Protestant sense, because just as Christ, through faith, has commuincated to us real wisdom, so has He imparted to us real sanctity and justification.

1:31.  Therefore, since the Christian has received all from God, if he wishes to glroy, he must do so in god, as is clear from Jeremiah 9:23-24.

He that glorieth, etc.  The citation here is only a summary of the Prophet’s word.

After that in the beginning of the verse the verb is understood (γενηται, it may come to pass).

May glory should be imperative, “let him glory” (Vulg. glorietur).

Lord (κύριος, Lord, in the LXX) really means Yahweh, God.

After havig shown (1:17 ff) that the Gospel is both preached and received by the humble and the simple, St Paul now tells the Corinthians that when announcing to them the glad tidings he observed the characteristic method of evangelical preaching.  This he did in order to conform to the divine plane, as already explained, and also in order that the Corinthians might derive the greatest profit from hearing the Gospel.

2:1.  And I, Brethren, when I came to you, came not in loftiness of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of Christ.
2:2.  For I judged not myself to know anything among you, but Jesus Christ, and him crucified.

1.  And I, etc, i.e., in conformity with the nature of the Gospel ministry, when I came to you the first time my preaching was simple in style and contents; I simply declared unto you the Gospel, avoiding all loftiness either in form or in matter.  The Apostle came to Corinth from Athens, where he had engaged in high dispute with the Stoics and Epicurians (Acts 17:18 ff.).  Perhaps his failure there induced him to employ at Corinth a method more in harmony with the requirements of the Gospel.

Testimony of Christ should be “testimony of God,” according to the Greek; and the meaning is that the Gospel, which Paul announced, was God’s witness to Christ.  Some MSS read “mystery” in place of “testimony.”

2.  For I judged not, etc.  If the negative οὐ, not, is to be connected with κρίνω, judged, the sense is: “I did not pretend to know,” etc.; if connected with ειδεναι, to know, we have: “I judged it better, or I decided, not to know,” etc.  The meaning is that, while at Athens just before coming to Corinth, St Paul had argued learnedly with philosophers, he made up his mind upon arriving in Corinth that it was better to keep to simple doctrines about Christ, especially the mystery of the Redemption.  Hence among you is in contrast with the Athenians.

2:3.  And I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling.
2:4.  And my speech and my preaching was not in the persuasive words of human wisdom, but in shewing of the spirit and powers;
2:5.  that your faith might not stand on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God.

3.  In weakness, and in fear, etc.  The weakness referred to was perhaps bodily infirmity (Gal 4:13; 2 Cor 10:10; 12:10), or the natural spiritual infirmity which he felt aside from the help of God (Acts 18:9-10).  the fear and trembling were probably caused by poor results he had just experienced at Athens (Acts 17:33), by prospect of stripes (i.e., being whipped) and persecutions (St Chrysostom), and by the greatness of the task that confronted him in Corinth (Acts 18:9).

4.  My speech, i.e., my private instructions given to individuals, and my preaching, i.e. my public discourse to the multitude (St Thomas), were not in persuasive words, etc., i.e., not after the manner in which the philosophers and rhetoricians were accustomed to address their hearers.

But in the shewing of the Spirit, etc., i.e., his preaching was directed by the Holy Ghost, who enlightened his mind to know and moved his will to say what was most useful and instructive; and who, at the same time, by his grace disposed the hearts of his hearers to receive his words with faith (Rom 1:16; 2 Cor 4:7).  Some authors understand the word powers to refer to the miracles that were worked in confirmation of the Apostle’s preaching.

Human (Vulgate, humanae) is found only in MSS A C; it is omitted by all the best MSS., Old Latin, Peshitto, and some copies of the Vulgate.

5.  St Paul had a special reason in avoiding a display of human wisdom and lofty language at Corinth, namely, that the faith of the Christians there might not be based on anything so vain and subject to error, but might have as its foundation the power of God, working through grace and miraculous gifts, which connot err or be led into error.




Posted in Bible, Catechetical Resources, Christ, fathers of the church, Notes on 1 Corinthians, Quotes, St Paul's life, St Thomas Aquinas | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »